▽▽▽ NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO ARTICULATE MY GENERAL PERSPECTIVE ON ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH MEN—SPECIFICALLY, HOW I BELIEVE SUCH RELATIONSHIPS OUGHT TO BE CONDUCTED BY A RESPECTABLE LADY.
1.A MAN MUST BE UNATTACHED—HE MUST HAVE "SINGLE" STATUS. HE MUST BE FREE OF ANY CURRENT FAMILY TIES, WHETHER THAT MEANS A WIFE OR A PARTNER. TO DO OTHERWISE RELEGATES A WOMAN TO A LOWER SOCIAL STATUS—AND THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE CASE; I AM STATING NOTHING NEW HERE. THIS ATTITUDE IS EVIDENT ACROSS ALL RELIGIONS, WHEREIN SUCH WOMEN ARE LABELED AS "WHORES"—THAT IS, WOMEN WHO SLEEP WITH MEN IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY. THESE ARE NOT LEGITIMATE RELATIONSHIPS, AND ANY CHILDREN BORN OF SUCH UNIONS HAVE NEVER BEEN CONSIDERED WELCOME; THEY ARE, IN ESSENCE, "BASTARDS." IN PLAIN TERMS, THIS MEANS "DEGENERATES"—ILLEGITIMATE INDIVIDUALS WHO POSSESS NO ENTITLEMENT TO ANY TITLES OR HONORS, AND WHOSE NAMES ARE FOREVER PRECEDED BY THE DESIGNATION OF "BASTARD" (OR "MONGREL").
- BASTARD (FROM THE ENGLISH AND GERMAN *BASTARD*: "ILLEGITIMATE," "EXTRAMARITAL," "BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK"). THIS TERM IS USED IN JURISPRUDENCE. IN EVERYDAY SPEECH IN ENGLISH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES, IT IS USED AS AN INSULT (CORRESPONDING TO THE RUSSIAN TERMS *UBLYUDOK* AND *VYRODOK*).
2.A WOMAN WHO CONDEMNS HERSELF AND HER OFFSPRING TO SUCH A RELATIONSHIP EFFECTIVELY SUBJECTS HERSELF—AND HER CHILDREN—TO THE SOCIETAL STIGMA OF BEING A “BASTARD” (OR “ILLEGITIMATE CHILD”).
3. IF A MAN DOES NOT WISH FOR HIS OFFSPRING TO BE PERMANENTLY BRANDED WITH THE STATUS OF "BASTARD," HE MUST TERMINATE ALL HIS EXISTING OFFICIAL RELATIONSHIPS *BEFORE* THE CHILD IS BORN AND ENTER INTO AN OFFICIAL UNION (WHAT IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED AS A CIVIL MARRIAGE) WITH THE WOMAN IN QUESTION. OTHERWISE—WHY DO MEN GET MARRIED AT ALL? WHY HAVE MEN CONSISTENTLY MARRIED THEIR PREGNANT FIANCEES THROUGHOUT THE YEARS? EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THESE CONCEPTS AND ACCEPTS THE ASSOCIATED RESPONSIBILITY—PROVIDED, OF COURSE, THAT THEY HAVE THE DESIRE TO DO SO. IN ESSENCE, A WOMAN WHO ACTS OTHERWISE IS, OF HER OWN ACCORD, CONDEMNING BOTH HERSELF AND HER OFFSPRING TO A STATUS OF DISGRACE. SURELY, I HAVEN'T JUST STATED ANYTHING PARTICULARLY NOVEL OR ILLOGICAL, HAVE I?
4. IF A MAN IS SINGLE, YET HOLDS A POSITION OF PARTICULAR STATUS AND SIGNIFICANCE WITHIN SOCIETY, HE IS EXPECTED TO PRESENT HIS CHOSEN PARTNER—AND THE WOMAN HERSELF—TO THAT SOCIETY. THIS IS THE ACCEPTED WORLDWIDE NORM. OTHERWISE, THE RELATIONSHIP AMOUNTS TO NOTHING MORE THAN THAT OF A CLIENT AND A PROSTITUTE. WOMEN HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN THIS; I HAVE REVEALED NOTHING NEW.
5. IF I DESIRE A RELATIONSHIP INVOLVING CHILDREN, THIS CONSTITUTES A HIGHLY RESPONSIBLE STEP. I MUST FULLY GRASP—AND DISCUSS WITH MY PARTNER—THE SUBSEQUENT TRAJECTORY OF THE CHILD'S LIFE: SPECIFICALLY, THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP UPON WHICH THEIR UNION WAS FOUNDED; WHO WILL PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT; AND HOW THEY PLAN TO ORGANIZE THEIR SHARED DOMESTIC LIFE, AS WELL AS THAT OF THE CHILD. LET ME REMIND YOU: AN UNWANTED PREGNANCY CAN BE EASILY RESOLVED IN OUR MODERN ERA THROUGH BOTH PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS. THIS IS NOT A GENDER REASSIGNMENT SURGERY; RATHER, IT IS THE MOST COMMON SURGICAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON WOMEN WORLDWIDE. CURRENTLY, ONLY BREAST AUGMENTATION SURGERY RIVALS THE GLOBAL VOLUME OF ABORTIONS.
6. WHEN A RESPONSIBLE MAN ANTICIPATES THAT HIS BEHAVIOR—WHICH BORDERS ON OR CHALLENGES ESTABLISHED SOCIAL NORMS AND CONVENTIONS—MIGHT TRIGGER A SCANDAL, HE PLACES HIS ENTIRE REPUTATION ON THE LINE BEFORE SOCIETY, HIS COLLEAGUES, HIS BUSINESS PARTNERS, AND SO FORTH. THAT IS WHY THE SPOUSES OF ALL THE WORLD'S TOP LEADERS ARE ACCORDED A SPECIFIC STATUS: FIRST LADY.
NOTE—*NOT* THE "FIRST WHORE" OR "VILLAGE SLUT," BUT THE *FIRST LADY*.
THIS SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT HOW OTHER NATIONS WILL, IN TURN, VIEW *ALL* THE WOMEN OF THAT COUNTRY. SUCH IS THE SOCIETAL NORM—I AM STATING NOTHING NEW HERE. MARRIED COUPLES CONSISTENTLY GARNER A HIGHER NUMBER OF VOTES IN ELECTIONS, SERVING AS AN EXPRESSION OF THE ELECTORATE'S APPRECIATION FOR—AND COMMITMENT TO—TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES. IF YOU BECOME PRESIDENT, THEN HAVE THE DECENCY TO CARRY YOUR STATUS WITH PRIDE—ENSURING IT REMAINS UNEQUIVOCALLY CLEAR THAT, AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF YOUR NATION, YOU ARE WORTHY OF RESPECT AND DESERVE TO BE HONORED.
7. THEREFORE, AS A WOMAN, I MUST TAKE FULL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE THE FUTURE SAFETY OF MY OFFSPRING. IT IS POINTLESS TO TALK ABOUT THE SAFETY OF ONE'S OFFSPRING AT SOME LATER DATE IF, UP UNTIL THAT POINT, YOU REMAINED INDIFFERENT TO THE MATTER AND YOUR ONLY CONTRIBUTION WAS FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IN FACT, IF A WOMAN DECIDES TO GIVE BIRTH—OR TO CONCEIVE IN THE FIRST PLACE—SHE MUST HAVE A CLEAR VISION OF HOW SHE INTENDS TO RAISE AND SUPPORT THAT CHILD FOR THE ENTIRE EIGHTEEN YEARS OF THEIR MINORITY.
FOR INSTANCE, I ALREADY OWNED AN APARTMENT WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE SEA AND A PRIVATE BEACH—PROPERTY FOR WHICH I PAY ENTIRELY OUT OF MY OWN POCKET. IT ALSO INCLUDED FULL, SECURE ACCESS PROTECTED BY THE BUILDING'S OWN SECURITY DETAIL. MY APARTMENT SPANNED OVER 100 SQUARE METERS. IN OTHER WORDS, I HAVE NO INTENTION OF CRAMMING MYSELF AND MY CHILD INTO SOME STUFFY, SHOEBOX-SIZED HOVEL—THE KIND I COULDN'T EVEN AFFORD TO PAY FOR ON MY OWN. I NEED A PLACE RIGHT ON THE SEAFRONT SO THAT, WHILE PREGNANT, I CAN GO INTO THE WATER TO DO THERAPEUTIC EXERCISES—AS IS CUSTOMARY AMONG NORMAL, SENSIBLE MOTHERS WHO PRIORITIZE THEIR OWN LONG-TERM HEALTH AND THE SUBSEQUENT STRENGTHENING OF THEIR BABY'S HEALTH. THIS ENTAILS GOOD NUTRITION, REGULAR WALKS, FRESH FRUIT, AND FRESH SEA AIR.
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: WHERE WILL THE CHILD LIVE? WHAT WILL THEIR LIVING CONDITIONS BE LIKE? AND ON WHAT BASIS WILL THEY RESIDE THERE?
WILL THIS INVOLVE CONSTANTLY RENTING ACCOMMODATION?
WHAT HAPPENS IF YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION TAKES A TURN FOR THE WORSE?
A WOMAN MUST BE CAPABLE OF CARING FOR HER OFFSPRING INDEPENDENTLY, WITHOUT RELYING ON FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM A MAN—ESPECIALLY IF THAT MAN IS NOT HER HUSBAND. IN OTHER WORDS, IF A WOMAN MAKES THE DECISION TO GIVE BIRTH ON HER OWN, THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THAT CHILD UNTIL THE AGE OF 18 IS SOLELY HER RESPONSIBILITY. FURTHERMORE, A HUSBAND COULD SUDDENLY PASS AWAY OR BECOME DISABLED. BUT THAT IS A HUSBAND; I SIMPLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT OTHER WOMEN—THOSE SLUTS—ARE HOPING FOR. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF QUESTIONS THAT SHOULD BE ASKED WHEN PLANNING A PREGNANCY OR WHEN DECIDING TO HAVE AN ABORTION.
8. NOWADAYS, A MAN CAN INDEPENDENTLY—WITHOUT A PARTNER—HAVE A CHILD OF HIS OWN BY UTILIZING SURROGACY. EFFECTIVELY, THIS COMPLETELY ELIMINATES ANY POSSIBILITY OF LEGAL DISPUTES AND ENSURES FULL, SOLE CUSTODY—WHICH IS EXTREMELY CONVENIENT. THIS IS PARTICULARLY TRUE FOR PROMINENT INDIVIDUALS WHO WIELD INFLUENCE IN THIS WORLD. A SINGLE FATHER WITH A CHILD—FREE FROM PROBLEMS, BICKERING, OR SCANDALS. FREE FROM ANY AFFRONT TO HIS PERSONAL DIGNITY IN THE EYES OF SOCIETY. HE WANTED A CHILD, AND HE GOT ONE—WITHOUT ANY OBLIGATIONS—BY DRAWING UPON AN EXTENSIVE DATABASE OF FEMALE BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL.
9. THEREFORE, ANY WOMAN POSSESSING EVEN A SINGLE FUNCTIONING BRAIN CELL OUGHT TO UNDERSTAND THE BASIS UPON WHICH SUCH A SOCIALLY PROMINENT AND INFLUENTIAL MAN HAS CHOSEN HER. IS SHE INTELLIGENT? BEAUTIFUL? SUCCESSFUL? DOES SHE COME FROM A DISTINGUISHED FAMILY? DOES SHE POSSESS MERITS WORTHY OF SOCIETY? WHAT CALIBER OF GENETIC MATERIAL CAN SHE PASS ON TO HER OFFSPRING? WHAT QUALITY DOES SHE POSSESS THAT IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF THE OTHER 8 BILLION PEOPLE ON THIS EARTH?
10. LOVE—WE DISCUSSED THIS EARLIER. IN SUCH CASES, THE MAN IMMEDIATELY PROPOSES TO HIS WOMAN, OR THEY ARE ALREADY IN A COMMITTED DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP. THEIRS IS A ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP, PROGRESSING THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STAGES. THEY DO NOT HIDE AWAY IN CLOSETS OR CUBBYHOLES.
11. WHAT IS THE EXPECTANT MOTHER’S SITUATION? THIS MOTHER MUST BE ENTIRELY CAPABLE OF PROVIDING FOR HER OFFSPRING ON HER OWN. IF WE ARE DISCUSSING SPERM DONATION, SHE MUST NOT PLAN TO LIVE OFF THE MAN INVOLVED. A SPERM DONOR SIMPLY PROVIDES BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL; NO FURTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS MAY BE MADE BEYOND THAT.
AS FOR MY OWN SITUATION: AS OF 2023, I POSSESSED SUBSTANTIAL SAVINGS—ENOUGH TO ALLOW ME TO STOP WORKING ENTIRELY FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD AND TO DEVOTE MYSELF FULLY TO RAISING MY CHILD FOR 5 TO 7 YEARS WITHOUT THE NEED TO HOLD A JOB. "NO MONEY, NO HONEY"—AS THEY LIKE TO SAY IN THE WEST.
12. A WOMAN MUST ALSO GIVE THOUGHT TO HER FUTURE LIFE LEADING UP TO THE TIME HER CHILD TURNS 18. STATISTICALLY SPEAKING, WOMEN WITH CHILDREN ARE OFTEN NO LONGER CONSIDERED DESIRABLE BY OTHER MEN; THEY ACQUIRE THE STATUS OF A "DIVORCÉE WITH BAGGAGE." IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THIS WAY. PINNING ONE'S HOPES ON A NEW RELATIONSHIP IS A FUTILE ENDEAVOR UNLESS THAT RELATIONSHIP IS FOUNDED ON TRUE LOVE. NOW, TELL ME: WHICH MAN WANTS TO TAKE ON A CHILD FATHERED BY AN EX-HUSBAND—ESPECIALLY ONE WHO HAPPENS TO BE A WEALTHY AND INFLUENTIAL FIGURE? THAT’S RIGHT—NO ONE. IT SPELLS NOTHING BUT TROUBLE. CONSEQUENTLY, A WOMAN IS EFFECTIVELY LEFT TO SHOULDER THE ENTIRE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF SUPPORTING HERSELF AND HER CHILD—EITHER UNTIL THE AGE OF 18, OR 21 (AS IS CUSTOMARY IN THE WEST)—ENTIRELY ON HER OWN. THAT IS, OF COURSE, UNLESS SHE INTENDS TO TURN TO PROSTITUTION AND HIT THE STREETS.
13. WHAT IS THIS WOMAN HOPING FOR? SPEAKING FOR MYSELF: I HAD CONCRETE PLANS—PLANS THAT WENT BEYOND MERE WORDS—TO OPEN A BUSINESS WITHIN THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND, SPECIFICALLY A LICENSED EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION FOR CHILDREN. MY INTENTION WAS TO TRANSFER A SUM EQUIVALENT TO 30% OF MY MONTHLY INCOME DIRECTLY INTO THE CHILD'S PERSONAL ACCOUNT. THIS WAS TO ENSURE THAT, REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER LIFE MIGHT BRING—BE IT MY DEATH OR DISABILITY—THE CHILD WOULD POSSESS A PERSONAL SAVINGS FUND GUARANTEEING THEIR FINANCIAL SECURITY, EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THEIR FATHER. IN OTHER WORDS, THE MOMENT THIS CHILD ENTERED THE WORLD, THEY WOULD IMMEDIATELY HAVE A DEDICATED FINANCIAL ACCOUNT TO SERVE AS A SAFETY NET. THIS ARRANGEMENT WOULD ALSO RESOLVE ANY POTENTIAL ISSUES REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS SHOULD THE CHILD SUBSEQUENTLY BE ADOPTED.
AND SO, WHO WOULD WANT SUCH A CHILD—A CHILD WHO IS NOT THE FRUIT OF LOVE, BUT MERELY THE BYPRODUCT OF A PROSTITUTE MOTHER’S QUEST FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY? WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY GOVERNED BY FORMAL DOCUMENTATION AND COMPREHENSIVE, BINDING AGREEMENTS—EVEN WHEN IT COMES TO PAID SUBSCRIPTIONS: YOU PAY THE FEE, AND ACCESS IS GRANTED. THERE IS NOTHING NEW ABOUT THIS. ESPECIALLY IN AN ERA WHERE A FATHER CAN INDEPENDENTLY HAVE A CHILD VIA A SURROGATE MOTHER AND BECOME THAT CHILD'S SOLE, LEGAL PARENT?
BOTH IN THE PAST AND TODAY, WOMEN WHO BEHAVE THIS WAY ARE A DISGRACE TO THEIR FAMILIES. DON'T EVEN TRY TO TELL ME OTHERWISE—ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO MUSLIM TRADITIONS.
THEREFORE, LACKING PROPER ANSWERS REGARDING WHERE THE CHILD WILL RESIDE—AND UPON WHAT FINANCIAL RESOURCES PROVIDED BY THE MOTHER THE CHILD CAN RELY UNTIL REACHING THE AGE OF 18—WE ARE DEALING WITH A DUBIOUS PRODUCT OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL: SPECIFICALLY, AN ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS A BASTARD. WHAT DO WOMEN HOPE TO GAIN WHEN THEY CONDUCT THEMSELVES LIKE PROSTITUTES? DO THEY EXPECT PUBLIC SOLICITUDE AND SYMPATHY? DO THEY EXPECT A DECENT INCOME TO BE SECURED FOR THE CHILD OVER THE NEXT 18 YEARS? IF THE MOTHER HERSELF GIVES NO THOUGHT TO HER OWN CHILD, WHY SHOULD A JOB BE AWARDED TO HER RATHER THAN TO A RESPECTABLE FAMILY—ONE IN WHICH BOTH PARENTS ARE EMPLOYED—OR TO A SINGLE MOTHER WHO HAS ESTABLISHED A SAVINGS FUND FOR HER CHILD AND UTILIZED IVF TO CONCEIVE INDEPENDENTLY? PERSONALLY, I PREFER TO OFFER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO MARRIED COUPLES WHO UPHOLD TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES AND HISTORICAL FAMILY TRADITIONS. WITH THEM, YOU SEE—THERE ARE SIMPLY FEWER PROBLEMS. AND NOW I’M SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE WORK FOR A PROSTITUTE—EVEN THOUGH I’M NOT A PIMP? WHY? SO SHE CAN STEAL OTHER WOMEN’S HUSBANDS AND LEAVE CHILDREN FATHERLESS?
EVERYTHING I HAVE DESCRIBED THUS FAR APPLIES TO SITUATIONS WHERE A WOMAN IS PLANNING MARRIAGE OR CONCEPTION WITH A MAN WHO HAS NO CHILDREN OF HIS OWN. BUT WHAT SHOULD SHE DO IF THE MAN ALREADY HAS CHILDREN WITH OTHER WOMEN? WHAT EXACTLY SHOULD SHE EXPECT? THIS QUESTION INEVITABLY ARISES WHENEVER ONE IS PLANNING A FUTURE FAMILY. A WOMAN MUST BE PREPARED TO CARE FOR HIS OTHER CHILDREN AS WELL—WHETHER THIS INVOLVES SHORT-TERM VISITS OR PERMANENT RESIDENCE. FURTHERMORE, SHE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT FAMILY EXPENSES ARE SHARED PROPORTIONALLY AND ALLOCATED TO SUPPORT ALL OF HIS CHILDREN, OR TO COVER CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS OWED TO HIS FORMER PARTNERS.
WE ARE ALL ADULTS HERE. NO ONE IS OBLIGATED TO SUPPORT SOMEONE ELSE'S CHILDREN. PERSONALLY, I DO NOT CONSIDER DATING MEN WHO HAVE CHILDREN IF THEY ARE UNABLE TO FULLY PROVIDE FOR MY OWN NEEDS. A PERSON SHOULD BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CARING FOR THEIR OWN OFFSPRING, WITHOUT RELYING ON ASSISTANCE FROM SOCIETY—AND HERE, I AM NOT REFERRING TO STATE AID IN THE FORM OF BENEFITS, BUT RATHER TO DELIBERATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM OTHER PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS; AFTER ALL, EVERYONE HAS THEIR OWN FAMILIES TO LOOK AFTER. IF A PERSON BEHAVES IN A MANNER THAT VIOLATES THE NORMS OF THE SOCIETY IN WHICH THEY LIVE—DEMONSTRATING A DISREGARD FOR THAT SOCIETY'S ESTABLISHED CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS—THEY INEVITABLY FACE WIDESPREAD PUBLIC CONDEMNATION FOR SUCH UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT. WHAT, EXACTLY, DID SHE EXPECT TO ACHIEVE ON HER OWN IF SHE IS INCAPABLE OF FEEDING HER OWN CHILD UNTIL THEY REACH ADULTHOOD? IN THE PAST, PEOPLE LIKE THIS WOULD HAVE WORKED IN THEIR OWN VEGETABLE GARDENS OR IN THE FIELDS—SUSTAINING THEMSELVES THROUGH THEIR OWN LABOR, WHETHER BY CULTIVATING CROPS OR RAISING LIVESTOCK—THEREBY ENSURING THAT THEY COULD SUBSEQUENTLY PROVIDE FOR THEIR OWN OFFSPRING. SHE COULD HAVE GONE TO WORK AS A MILKMAID INSTEAD. THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL A DISGRACE. HOWEVER, PROSTITUTES SOMETIMES EXPERIENCE OUT-OF-WEDLOCK PREGNANCIES, WHICH ARE RESOLVED THROUGH MEDICAL PROCEDURES—SUCH AS ABORTION.
What did this woman want? What was she hoping for? What did she intend to do? She was taken under protection subject to specific conditions—because, personally, in 2023, my life was under threat at almost every turn; yet, everywhere I went—thank God—there were cameras. But they were never enough to ensure my safety.
▽▽▽?DO RUSSIANS, IN GENERAL, HARBOR SOME SORT OF PECULIAR AFFECTION FOR THE NAME ELON MUSK?